This is the first of a series of short posts setting out what we do in the DDS German Longsword Class. They're intended for people who already attend the DDS Longsword class. For this reason, we haven't bothered with illustrations, though these may come.
Since these are class notes, we haven't justified our interpretations or provided citations. However, each and every technique given here fits the Goliath and associated family of texts and has been rigorously tested. (Some sources here.)
Please note that we know we have done Bad Things when anglicizing the German terms.
Monday, 22 September 2014
Sunday, 27 April 2014
The Duel - An Essay
The Duel
by Jean-Loup Rebours-Smith
André and Zack had been training together for a few years now and though there were others they normally trained with in the salle, they more frequently ended up paired up doing drills and other exercises. You start to know someone after training with them for a while. You see their play change, evolve into something smoother, sharper and less predictable. Yet at the same time your own play follows a similar path. An awkward dance becomes a continuous flowing motion. The body starts to move almost by itself, reacting rather than responding.
That night André felt particularly clear headed. When the time came to stop exercising and to start duelling he was more ready than he had even been. There was a twinkle in Zack’s eyes too that suggested a similar readiness and somewhere, as if coming out of thin air, a pulsating rhythm started to play, like the drumming of a distant tribe in the jungle.
Their swords firmly gripped, thumb gently resting behind the ricasso, they entered the duelling arena holding their masks under their left arm. At the call of the judges, their swords clashed and swooshed in a determined and respectful salute as is traditional. Having paid their respects to the judges and everyone watching, they assumed an en-garde position, left hand on one hip and sword pointing forward both shielding and threatening at the same time.
When the call was given, André quickly opened his play with a cut to the head. A swift parry and riposte from Zack forced him to drop his guard low to protect his right flank. Just as quickly he riposted again but Zack blocked him and took a step backward. Openings are often used as a test to feel your opponent’s swiftness to respond and as such there is little point to keep the flow going for too long. When the stream train gets on its way it must first start at a slow pace before accelerating to full speed.
André attacked again, this time with a beat, but Zack knew better than to let his sword taken offline and he evaded the beat responding with an attempt to thrust directly at André’s chest. This was a clever and swift move but not one André was unfamiliar with. He dropped his blade to close the door to Zack’s thrust sending it offline. A good fencer never over-commits however and André’s returned cut was once again parried.
And then time started to slow down. As each cut and thrust was parried the riposte was sent to a precise opening only to land again on the other’s parrying blade. Again and again the blades clashed like a clock ticking inexorably setting into an unbreakable rhythm. Even as each of them looked for alternatives to their play, so swift was their response and so clear was their minds that there seemed to be no way to escape save through sheer exhaustion.
But exhaustion wasn’t an option, not when euphoria was driving their swords back and forth. Breaks were taken only to preserve energy and look for alternative strategies but with each return to guard another lock on rhythmic exchanges was the only possible result and it was hypnotic.
Nobody knows how long they spent fighting each other. It seemed like time was now determined by the clockwork of their clashing blades forming a bubble that isolated them from the outside world. The judges and the public were trapped inside the sphere, wondering who would come out victorious eventually.
Whilst dances are rehearsed, duels are drilled into the swordsman and the sword becomes both arms and armour. Victory isn’t about who hits most often but how easily you can slip into the duelling dance. That night, André and Zack knew they were now ready to take on anyone who would dare challenge them.
Tuesday, 3 September 2013
German Longsword Meisterhaus
Here's a summary of our current thinking on the Meisterhaus - the correct plural is Meisterhäue, but we tend to Anglicise our technical terms, if only to make Claire Graf shudder - based on several years of consulting the texts and experimenting. Please note that this is intended as a study aid and won't make much sense without attending the classes!
Saturday, 13 April 2013
DDS at Conpulsion
We try to do Conpulsion, Edinburgh's mega gaming convention, every year. It has an amazing atmosphere, like the Auld Hoose but with the lights up and polyhedral dice rather than beer.
Monday, 29 October 2012
Heel or Toe? Watch your feet
I recently had a bit of a revelation while paying particular attention to how my balance worked depending on whether I took the next step with my foot toe-first or heel-first. It gave me all sorts of ideas for things to give people to think about we more often than not simply take for granted.
But before I cover the difference between each step let's think about the back foot for one moment.
Whether it is for stepping in and out of measure or whether it is for lunging, how we distribute our weight from the back foot can be a matter of losing or winning a bout. Generally speaking in both cases you want to delay the shift of weight from the back foot to the front foot as much as possible. This allows you space and energy to divert your step at the very last second thus permitting a void or a retreat to happen depending on what your opponent does. This control of feet is often rather overlooked, especially in more "upright" fencing systems. However, in many rapier systems, which can have some rather dramatic weight-shifts, this is a very important principle. One needs only to read between the lines of Girard Thibault d'Anvers's treatise to realise that if you allow your weight to be delayed over the front foot you can then respond in proper tempo to an incoming attack and step accordingly for a safe defence to occur. Many Italian systems also allow for this space by having the major guards with the weight placed further back onto the back leg.
With this in mind, whether one steps or whether on lunges, which part of the front foot will make contact with the ground first is essential. When stepping with the toes extended, it allows for greater balance and flexibility due to a wider circle being created between the back foot, which acts as a pivot, and the front foot, which "draws the circle". This is the sort of step you want to make when simply stepping in and out of measure, whether you are circling your opponent or moving along a straight line. As an exercise, stand feet together, the back foot (left if you're right handed) either firmly on the ground or with the heel raised a little off the ground and take a step forward with toe pointed towards the ground. Now feel the weight staying over your back leg and see how stable you are without putting the front foot down on the ground, instead drawing an arc with your toe.
Now let's see what happens with the lunge. An important aspect of the lunge is the ability to recover. Some later systems advocate deep lunges and they have their reasons to do so. However focussing solely on rapier systems, it is fair to assume that one wants to be able to safely recover from a lunge. As we've seen the front toe pointing down increases the diameter of your "stepping circle". With the lunge, the further forward you step, the harder it is to recover. I personally recommend lunges to be no longer than one foot's length, that's the distance of your own foot, not the imperial measure. And to allow for this shortened distance, I recommend your lunging step to be lead with your heel. Not only will it allow you to step at a safe recoverable distance but it will also prevent more severe ankle twisting which usually happens due to the ball of the front foot rotating on landing. As a reminder, the foot must always be the last part of the body to start moving during a lunge, lunges should always be lead by the point of the sword to minimise the distance it requires to travel to its intended target.
To summarise, when stepping, lead with the toes, when lunging, lead with the heel. And while this is a simple deduction borne of my own experiments, I am more than happy to have people discuss the practical application of this method, bearing in mind that I make no claim of universal truth along all fencing systems, more that it is mostly relevant amongst rapier systems, but may be helpful for other systems.
But before I cover the difference between each step let's think about the back foot for one moment.
Whether it is for stepping in and out of measure or whether it is for lunging, how we distribute our weight from the back foot can be a matter of losing or winning a bout. Generally speaking in both cases you want to delay the shift of weight from the back foot to the front foot as much as possible. This allows you space and energy to divert your step at the very last second thus permitting a void or a retreat to happen depending on what your opponent does. This control of feet is often rather overlooked, especially in more "upright" fencing systems. However, in many rapier systems, which can have some rather dramatic weight-shifts, this is a very important principle. One needs only to read between the lines of Girard Thibault d'Anvers's treatise to realise that if you allow your weight to be delayed over the front foot you can then respond in proper tempo to an incoming attack and step accordingly for a safe defence to occur. Many Italian systems also allow for this space by having the major guards with the weight placed further back onto the back leg.
With this in mind, whether one steps or whether on lunges, which part of the front foot will make contact with the ground first is essential. When stepping with the toes extended, it allows for greater balance and flexibility due to a wider circle being created between the back foot, which acts as a pivot, and the front foot, which "draws the circle". This is the sort of step you want to make when simply stepping in and out of measure, whether you are circling your opponent or moving along a straight line. As an exercise, stand feet together, the back foot (left if you're right handed) either firmly on the ground or with the heel raised a little off the ground and take a step forward with toe pointed towards the ground. Now feel the weight staying over your back leg and see how stable you are without putting the front foot down on the ground, instead drawing an arc with your toe.
Now let's see what happens with the lunge. An important aspect of the lunge is the ability to recover. Some later systems advocate deep lunges and they have their reasons to do so. However focussing solely on rapier systems, it is fair to assume that one wants to be able to safely recover from a lunge. As we've seen the front toe pointing down increases the diameter of your "stepping circle". With the lunge, the further forward you step, the harder it is to recover. I personally recommend lunges to be no longer than one foot's length, that's the distance of your own foot, not the imperial measure. And to allow for this shortened distance, I recommend your lunging step to be lead with your heel. Not only will it allow you to step at a safe recoverable distance but it will also prevent more severe ankle twisting which usually happens due to the ball of the front foot rotating on landing. As a reminder, the foot must always be the last part of the body to start moving during a lunge, lunges should always be lead by the point of the sword to minimise the distance it requires to travel to its intended target.
To summarise, when stepping, lead with the toes, when lunging, lead with the heel. And while this is a simple deduction borne of my own experiments, I am more than happy to have people discuss the practical application of this method, bearing in mind that I make no claim of universal truth along all fencing systems, more that it is mostly relevant amongst rapier systems, but may be helpful for other systems.
Tuesday, 18 September 2012
Zornhau
Zornhau - trans; "Wrath strike" - is a diagonal cut.
Diagonal is good because the target can't duck or sidestep, it gets power from both gravity and the motion of your body, and because it clears away incoming weapons as it strikes home - "Fencing Securely".
Diagonal is good because the target can't duck or sidestep, it gets power from both gravity and the motion of your body, and because it clears away incoming weapons as it strikes home - "Fencing Securely".
Tuesday, 11 September 2012
What we teach in Tuesday's German Longsword class
Well, I was going to teach Krumphau tonight, but the study group found what looks like a much better way of doing it, and I'm not teaching it until I know it really works...
...and that's us. In a nutshell, we teach only those reconstructed Longsword techniques that actually work when we try to break them. If they break, then either our interpretation is wrong, or we're not fit or fast enough.
...and that's us. In a nutshell, we teach only those reconstructed Longsword techniques that actually work when we try to break them. If they break, then either our interpretation is wrong, or we're not fit or fast enough.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)